home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- This file is copyright of Jens Schriver (c)
- It originates from the Evil House of Cheat
- More essays can always be found at:
- --- http://www.CheatHouse.com ---
- ... and contact can always be made to:
- Webmaster@cheathouse.com
- --------------------------------------------------------------
- Essay Name : 1359.txt
- Uploader : Ed Holmes
- Email Address :
- Language : english
- Subject : Drugs
- Title : capital punishment
- Grade : B
- School System : college
- Country : U.S.
- Author Comments :
- Teacher Comments :
- Date :
- Site found at : surfing
- --------------------------------------------------------------
-
- The Debate over the merits of capital punishment has endured
- for years, and continues to be an extremely indecisive and
- complicated issue. Adversaries of capital punishment point to the
- Marshalls and the Millgards, while proponents point to the Dahmers
- and Gacys. Society must be kept safe from the monstrous barbaric
- acts of these individuals and other killers, by taking away their
- lives to function and perform in our society. At the same time, we
- must insure that innocent people such as Marshall and Millgard are
- never convicted or sentenced to death for a crime that they did not
- commit.
- Many contend that the use of capital punishment as a form of
- deterrence does not work, as there are no fewer murders on a per-
- capita basis in countries or states that do have it, then those
- that do not. In order for capital punishment to work as a
- deterrence, certain events must be present in the criminal's mind
- prior to committing the offence. The criminal must be aware that
- others have been punished in the past for the offence that he or
- she is planning, and that what happened to another individual who
- committed this offence, can also happen to me.
- But individuals who commit any types of crime ranging from
- auto theft to 1st-Degree Murder, never take into account the
- consequences of their actions. Deterrence to crime, is rooted in
- the individuals themselves. Every human has a personal set of
- conduct. How much they will and will not tolerate. How far they
- will and will not go. This personal set of conduct can be made or
- be broken by friends, influences, family, home, life, etc. An
- individual who is never taught some sort of restraint as a child,
- will probably never understand any limit as to what they can do,
- until they have learned it themselves. Therefore, capital
- punishment will never truly work as a deterrent, because of human
- nature to ignore practised advice and to self learn.
- There are those who claim that capital punishment is in itself
- a form of vengeance on the killer. But isn't locking up a human
- being behind steel bars for many years, vengeance itself? And is it
- "humane" that an individual who took the life of another, should
- receive heating, clothing, indoor plumbing, 3 meals a day, while a
- homeless person who has harmed no one receives nothing? Adversaries
- of capital punishment claim that it is far more humane then having
- the state take away the life of the individual.
- In February 1963, Gary McCorkell, a 19 year old sex offender,
- was scheduled to hang. But just days before his execution, the then
- Liberal cabinet of Lester Person commuted McCorkell to life in
- prison.
- Less than 20 years later, McCorkell was arrested, tried, and
- convicted for the kidnapping and rape of a 10-year old Tenessee
- boy. He was sentanced to 63 years in prison. Prior to leaving
- Canada, he was sought by Metro Police in the attempted murder of an
- 11-year old boy.
- What has been gained by this? Had McCorkell been executed in
- 1963, two boys would never have had to have gone through the horror
- of being sexually abused. These individuals may themselves become
- sex offenders, as many sex offenders were sexually abused as
- children.
- McCorkell may have been a victim of sexually assualt in the
- past, but that does not justify what he did. He did not do this
- once, he killed two boys, and assaulted two others, leaving one for
- dead. He knew exactly what he was doing. What right does this man
- have to live? He has ruined the lives of 4 children, what will he
- do in life that will compensate for that? What kind of a life would
- the state have been taking away in this case? An innocent life? A
- forgiving life? No, a life that was beyond the realm of reform, and
- did not care to be.
- We must be careful. We must be very careful to never, even
- when suspicion may cause considerable doubt, send an innocent
- person to be executed. It could have happened to David Millgard, it
- could have happened to Donald Marshall. It probably has even
- occured numerous times in the history of the earth. But with proper
- police investigations, and where the evidence shows that the
- individual is a threat to the peace of society as long as he or she
- is alive, capital punishment must be used.
-
- --------------------------------------------------------------
-